Vojenské Rozhledy

Czech Military Review

Vojenské rozhledy / Czech Military Review Nr. 1/2011, Vol. XX. (LII.): 71-82

Civil-Military Reflections: Does the Army Need Its Own Value Code? (Military Culture, Professionalism, and Constabulary Force)Informational pages

Tomáš Kučera Author profile

Relations between a military and a civilian society belong to the core issue of civil-military studies. This article reflects main ideas and concepts used in theoretical and analytical literature, including seminar works by Samuel Huntington and Morris Janowitz. A military culture, military ethics and influence of new technologies, full-volunteer army and new missions on military culture are discussed. An abstract term "military" can change very significantly in accordance with actual military culture, perceptible to the fact how civilian society accepts military values. Therefore, not only size and equipment determine how particular armed forces look like. The author introduces the term Constabulary Force reflecting the idea that primary purpose of forces today are low-intensity conflicts and operations other than war.

Keywords: armed forces of the czech republic,civil-military relations,culture of organization,military culture

Published: March 15, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kučera, T. (2011). Civil-Military Reflections: Does the Army Need Its Own Value Code? (Military Culture, Professionalism, and Constabulary Force). Czech Military Review, 92(1), 71-82
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AVANT, D. The privatization of security and change in the control of force. International Studies Perspectives. 5 (2), 2004: 153-157. Go to original source...
    2. BELKIN, A. Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Does the Gay Ban Undermine the Military's Reputation?. Armed Forces and Society. 34 (2), 2008: 276. Go to original source...
    3. BELKIN, A. a BATEMAN, G. Don't ask, don't tell: debating the gay ban in the military. Lynne Rienner Pub. 2003. Go to original source...
    4. BELKIN, A. Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Is the Gay Ban Based on Military Necessity? Parameter. 33 (2), 2003: 108-120. Go to original source...
    5. COHEN, Eliot A revolution in warfare. Foreign Affairs. 75 (2), 1996: 37-54. Go to original source...
    6. COHN, L. The Evolution of the Civil-Military Gap Debate. Triangle Institute for Security Studies. 1999 Staženo dne: 7.3.2010.
    7. COKER, Christopher. The warrior ethos: military culture and the war on terror. London and New York: Routledge, 2007. Go to original source...
    8. DANDEKER, C. On the need to be different: Military uniqueness and civil-military relations in modern society. The RUSI Journal, 146 (3), 2001: 4-9. Go to original source...
    9. DUNLAP, Charles J. The police-ization of the military. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 27 (2), 1999: 217-233.
    10. EDMUNDS, T. What are armed forces for? The changing nature of military roles in Europe. International Affairs, 82, 2006: 1059-1075. Go to original source...
    11. FEAVER, P. a GELPI, C. Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton University Press, 2004.
    12. FEAVER, P. D. The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces and Society, 23, 1996: 149-178. Go to original source...
    13. GOLDSTEIN, L. J. General John Shalikashvili and the Civil-Military Relations of Peacekeeping. Armed Forces and Society, 26 (3), 2000: 387. Go to original source...
    14. GRONKE, P. a FEAVER, P. D. Uncertain confidence: Civilian and military attitudes about civil-military relations. Triangle Institute for Security Studies. 2000 Staženo dne: 8.6.2009.
    15. HUNTINGTON, S. P. Reforming civil-military relations. Journal of Democracy, 6 (4), 1995: 9-17. Go to original source...
    16. HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, London. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2000.
    17. HYDE, C. K. Casualty Aversion: Implications for Policy Makers and Senior Military Officers. Naval War College Newport. 2000 Staženo dne: 8. 6. 2009. Go to original source...
    18. KASURAK, Peter C. Civilianization and the military ethos: civil-military relations in Kanada. Canadian Public Administration. 25 (1), 1982: 108-129. Go to original source...
    19. KIER, E. Homosexuals in the US military: Open integration and combat effectiveness. International Security, 23 (2), 1998: 5-39. Go to original source...
    20. KORB, Lawrence. The Military and Social Change. Triangle Institute for Security Studies. 1996.
    21. LAFEBER, Walter The Rise and Fall of Colin Powell and the Powell Doctrine. Political Science Quarterly, 124 (1), 2009: 71-93. Go to original source...
    22. MARINER, R. B. A Soldier is a Soldier. Joint Forces Quarterly, 1993: 54-61.
    23. MARKUSEN, A. R. The case against privatizing national security. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. 16 (4), 2003: 471-501. Go to original source...
    24. MCAFEE, Mildred We're Looking for A Few Good Men: The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on Women in the Military. Minerva, 10 (2), 1992.
    25. MUELLER, J. Public opinion as a constraint on US foreign policy: Assessing the perceived value of American and foreign lives. Připraveno pro: International Studies Association, 41st Annual Convention Los Angeles, CA March 14-18. 2000 Staženo dne: 8.6.2009.
    26. RICKS, Thomas E. The Widening Gap Between the Military and Society. The Atlantic Monthly. (July), 1997: 67-78.
    27. RICKS, Thomas E. On American Soil: The Widening Gap between the U.S. Military and U.S. Society. John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies. 1996.
    28. SAIDEMAN, S. M. Overlooking the obvious: Bringing international politics back into ethnic conflict management. International Studies Review, 4 (3), 2002: 63-86. Go to original source...
    29. SINGER, P. W. Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry and its ramifications for international security. International Security, 26 (3), 2002: 186-220. Go to original source...
    30. SINGER, P. W. Outsourcing war. Foreign Affairs, 84, 2005: 119. Go to original source...
    31. SINGER, P. W. Corporate warriors: the rise of the privatized military industry. Cornell Univ Press, 2004.
    32. SINGER, P. W. Wired for war: the robotics revolution and conflict in the twenty-first century. New York: Penguin Press, 2009.
    33. STIEHM, J. H. Managing the Military's Homosexual Exclusion Policy: Text and Subtext. U. Miami L. Rev. 46, 1991: 685.
    34. STIEHM, J. H. Women, peacekeeping and peacemaking: Gender balance and mainstreaming. International Peacekeeping, 8 (2), 2001: 39-48. Go to original source...
    35. VAN CREVELD, M. Less than we can be: Men, women and the modern military. Journal of Strategic Studies, 23 (4), 2000: 1-20. Go to original source...
    36. WILLIAMS, Michael C. Civil military relations and peacekeeping. Oxford and New York. Oxford Univ. Press. 1998.
    37. WINSLOW, D. Misplaced Loyalties: The Role of Military Culture in the Breakdown of Discipline in Peace Operations. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 6 (3), 2004: 1-18.

    Return to the content